Foundations to FrontierPart III: Calculus IBezhig

Module 06: Limits: nearby behavior, not point substitution

8 exercises, each with a complete solution. 1 figure.

On this page
  1. A. Prerequisites and observable goals
  2. B. The central idea: separate “near” from “at”
  3. C. Limit laws and forms that require work
  4. D. Why canceling near a hole is legitimate
  5. E. Choose the method before calculating
  6. F. Worked examples
  7. G. Independent practice
  8. H. Complete solutions: Module 06
  9. I. Retention and readiness

A. Prerequisites and observable goals#

Before

Difference quotients, factorization, radicals, and unit-circle trigonometry.

After

Compute limits by appropriate methods, distinguish one-sided behavior, interpret tables and graphs cautiously, and identify infinite behavior and asymptotes.

B. The central idea: separate “near” from “at”#

The notation lim⁡x→af(x)=L\lim_{x\to a}f(x)=L describes the output values for inputs arbitrarily close to aa, excluding aa itself. It does not assert f(a)=Lf(a)=L, nor even that f(a)f(a) exists. A function can have a hole, a reassigned value, or no definition at the approached point while nearby values approach a well-defined number.

A left-hand limit uses inputs x<ax<a; a right-hand limit uses inputs x>ax>a. A two-sided finite limit exists exactly when the two one-sided limits exist and equal the same finite number. A table can suggest an approach, and a graph can communicate the pattern, but neither a finite table nor a coarse screen proves the behavior for all sufficiently close inputs. Precise definitions and limit laws: [O1L].

C. Limit laws and forms that require work#

If f(x)→Af(x)\to A and g(x)→Bg(x)\to B as x→ax\to a, then sums, products, and constant multiples have the expected limits. The quotient limit is A/BA/B only when B≠0B\ne0. Polynomial limits may be found by substitution, and rational functions may be evaluated by substitution wherever their denominator is nonzero.

The radian limits lim⁡u→0sin⁡u/u=1\lim_{u\to0}\sin u/u=1 and lim⁡u→0(1−cos⁡u)/u=0\lim_{u\to0}(1-\cos u)/u=0 are basic trigonometric limits. The first can be established by comparing sector and triangle areas, giving cos⁡u≤sin⁡u/u≤1\cos u\le\sin u/u\le1 for small positive uu, then using symmetry for negative uu. The squeeze theorem says that if g≤f≤hg\le f\le h near aa and both outside functions tend to LL, then ff also tends to LL.

The statement f(x)→+∞f(x)\to+\infty describes unbounded growth, not convergence to a real number. A vertical asymptote x=ax=a occurs when at least one one-sided function value tends to +∞+\infty or −∞-\infty. A horizontal asymptote y=Ly=L describes a finite limit as x→+∞x\to+\infty or x→−∞x\to-\infty. A graph may cross a horizontal asymptote.

D. Why canceling near a hole is legitimate#

For x≠3x\ne3, (x2−9)/(x−3)=x+3(x^2-9)/(x-3)=x+3. Limits ignore the value at the approached input, so both expressions have the same limit as x→3x\to3, namely 66. This is not cancellation at zero: every nearby input considered in the quotient has x−3≠0x-3\ne0. The limit is then taken for the equivalent nearby expression.

At infinity, divide a rational function’s numerator and denominator by the highest relevant power of xx. For example,

5x2−x+22x2+7=5−1/x+2/x22+7/x2⟶52.\frac{5x^2-x+2}{2x^2+7} =\frac{5-1/x+2/x^2}{2+7/x^2}\longrightarrow\frac52.

For radicals, x2=∣x∣\sqrt{x^2}=|x| matters: x2+1/x\sqrt{x^2+1}/x tends to 11 at +∞+\infty but −1-1 at −∞-\infty.

An exact piecewise construction: g(x)=x+1g(x)=x+1 for x<1x<1, g(1)=0g(1)=0, and g(x)=x+2g(x)=x+2 for x>1x>1. Open circles record excluded endpoint values of the branches; the filled dot records g(1)g(1). The two sides approach different heights.

E. Choose the method before calculating#

Try substitution where the usual continuity rules apply. If it produces 0/00/0, inspect for factors, a conjugate, or a standard trigonometric form. If the denominator approaches zero but the numerator does not, examine signs on each side. For absolute values or piecewise formulas, split into sides. At infinity, compare growth or divide by powers. If an oscillatory factor is bounded and multiplied by something approaching zero, try squeezing. Do not use L’Hôpital’s rule before its hypotheses and derivative machinery have been taught in Module 15.

F. Worked examples#

A radical. For x≠4x\ne4,

x−2x−4=1x+2⟶14.\frac{\sqrt x-2}{x-4} =\frac1{\sqrt x+2}\longrightarrow\frac14.

The conjugate converts the numerator to x−4x-4, which is a cancellable nonzero factor near 44.

A trigonometric rescaling. Write

sin⁡(5x)2x=52sin⁡(5x)5x.\frac{\sin(5x)}{2x}=\frac52\frac{\sin(5x)}{5x}.

As x→0x\to0, the second factor tends to 11, so the limit is 5/25/2. The variable inside sine must match the denominator of the standard limit.

One-sided sign. As x→2+x\to2^+, 1/(x−2)1/(x-2) tends to +∞+\infty; from the left it tends to −∞-\infty. There is no common two-sided finite limit. By contrast 1/(x−2)21/(x-2)^2 tends to +∞+\infty from both sides.

G. Independent practice#

F foundation C standard course work T transfer S optional stretch L runnable lab or project. Attempt the complete set before opening its solutions.

M06.01FSolution

Evaluate lim⁡x→2(x2+x−6)/(x−2)\lim_{x\to2}(x^2+x-6)/(x-2). Explain why direct substitution is insufficient.

M06.02CSolution

Evaluate lim⁡x→0(9+x−3)/x\lim_{x\to0}(\sqrt{9+x}-3)/x.

M06.03CSolution

Evaluate lim⁡x→0sin⁡(7x)/(3x)\lim_{x\to0}\sin(7x)/(3x), with radian inputs.

M06.04CSolution

Find both one-sided limits of ∣x∣/x|x|/x at 00 and decide whether the two-sided limit exists.

M06.05TSolution

For the function in the figure, report g(1)g(1), lim⁡x→1−g(x)\lim_{x\to1^-}g(x), lim⁡x→1+g(x)\lim_{x\to1^+}g(x), and the two-sided limit.

M06.06CSolution

Find the limits of x2+4/x\sqrt{x^2+4}/x as x→+∞x\to+\infty and as x→−∞x\to-\infty.

M06.07TSolution

Use inequalities to prove lim⁡x→0x2sin⁡(1/x)=0\lim_{x\to0}x^2\sin(1/x)=0, without trying to assign sin⁡(1/0)\sin(1/0).

M06.08SSolution

Find the vertical and horizontal asymptotes of r(x)=(2x+1)/(x−3)r(x)=(2x+1)/(x-3) and the signs of its infinite one-sided limits at 33. Can it equal its horizontal-asymptote height?

Optional small hints

For M06.02, rationalize. For M06.06, factor x2x^2 out of the radical but replace x2\sqrt{x^2} by ∣x∣|x|. For M06.08, rewrite r(x)=2+7/(x−3)r(x)=2+7/(x-3).

H. Complete solutions: Module 06#

Compare the first step where your work differs. A corrected answer is not yet an independent success.

M06.01Show solution

A removable hole

Substitution gives 0/00/0, so the quotient law is not available. Factor x2+x−6=(x−2)(x+3)x^2+x-6=(x-2)(x+3). For x≠2x\ne2 the quotient equals x+3x+3, whose limit at 22 is 5\boxed5. The original still has no value at 22; the limit describes its nearby values.

Back to M06.01
M06.02Show solution

Rationalization

Multiply by (9+x+3)/(9+x+3)(\sqrt{9+x}+3)/(\sqrt{9+x}+3). The numerator becomes (9+x)−9=x(9+x)-9=x, yielding 1/(9+x+3)1/(\sqrt{9+x}+3) for nearby nonzero xx. This continuous expression tends to 1/6\boxed{1/6}. All nearby inputs can be chosen greater than −9-9, preserving the radical’s domain.

Back to M06.02
M06.03Show solution

Match the standard limit

Rewrite the expression as (7/3)[sin⁡(7x)/(7x)](7/3)[\sin(7x)/(7x)]. With u=7xu=7x, u→0u\to0, and the bracket approaches 11. Thus the limit is 7/3\boxed{7/3}. The radian hypothesis matters because the small-angle ratio would have a different scale in degrees.

Back to M06.03
M06.04Show solution

Different branches give different limits

For x<0x<0, ∣x∣=−x|x|=-x, so the quotient is −1-1. For x>0x>0, it is 11. Hence the left limit is −1-1 and the right limit 11. They disagree, so the two-sided limit does not exist. Defining the function at 00 would not fix that disagreement.

Back to M06.04
M06.05Show solution

A filled dot is not a limit

The filled dot gives g(1)=0g(1)=0. The left branch x+1x+1 tends to 22 and the right branch x+2x+2 tends to 33. Therefore the two-sided limit does not exist. Neither open-circle height is the actual point value, and neither alone determines a two-sided limit.

Back to M06.05
M06.06Show solution

The absolute value controls the sign

For x≠0x\ne0,

x2+4x=∣x∣x1+4x2.\frac{\sqrt{x^2+4}}x=\frac{|x|}{x}\sqrt{1+\frac4{x^2}}.

At +∞+\infty, ∣x∣/x=1|x|/x=1, so the limit is 1\boxed1. At −∞-\infty, ∣x∣/x=−1|x|/x=-1, so it is −1\boxed{-1}. The radical itself is nonnegative on both sides; the denominator changes the quotient’s sign.

Back to M06.06
M06.07Show solution

Oscillation trapped between vanishing bounds

For every x≠0x\ne0, −1≤sin⁡(1/x)≤1-1\le\sin(1/x)\le1. Since x2≥0x^2\ge0, multiplying preserves the inequalities:

−x2≤x2sin⁡(1/x)≤x2.-x^2\le x^2\sin(1/x)\le x^2.

Both bounds approach zero, so the squeeze theorem proves the middle expression tends to 0\boxed0. No limit of sin⁡(1/x)\sin(1/x) by itself was required.

Back to M06.07
M06.08Show solution

Separate vertical from end behavior

Long division gives r(x)=2+7/(x−3)r(x)=2+7/(x-3). Thus x=3x=3 is a vertical asymptote: from the left the fractional term tends to −∞-\infty, and from the right to +∞+\infty. As x→±∞x\to\pm\infty, the fraction tends to zero, so y=2y=2 is the horizontal asymptote. Solving 2+7/(x−3)=22+7/(x-3)=2 would require 7/(x−3)=07/(x-3)=0, impossible for any finite allowed xx. This particular curve never reaches its horizontal asymptote; that is not a general prohibition for all curves.

Back to M06.08

I. Retention and readiness#

Revisit M01.03, M04.03, and M05.03. Explain what 0/00/0 tells you: the current form is inconclusive, not that the answer is zero. Advance when you can choose among factoring, conjugates, one-sided cases, and squeezing in a mixed set. Review R1 follows Module 08.